Use the following list to help you evaluate sources. Answer the questions as appropriate, and then rank each of the 5 parts from 1 to 10. (1 = unreliable, 10 = excellent.) The total score at the bottom will give you an idea of whether or not this is a source you should use.
Currency: Timeliness of the information _ _/10
When was the information published or posted?
Has the information been revised or updated?
Are their similar but more updated studies, articles, etc. on the same topic?
Does your topic require current information, or will older sources work as well?
Relevance: Importance of the information for your need__/10
Does the information relate to your topic?
Does this information add a needed perspective to the rest of your sources?
Who is the intended audience?
Is the information at an appropriate level for your needs?
Have you looked at a variety of sources before deciding this is one to use?
Would you be comfortable citing this source in your research paper?
Authority: Source or author of the information__/10
Who is the author / publisher / source / sponsor?
What are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations?
Is the author qualified to write on the topic? What are their primary areas of study?
Is there contact information, such as a publisher or email address?
Can you verify information about the author/publisher from another unrelated source?
Accuracy: Reliable, truthful and correctness of the content __/10
Is the information supported by evidence?
How has the information been reviewed or refereed?
Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge?
Does the language or tone seem unbiased and free of emotion?
Has all or part of the information been retracted? Or, conversely, cited many times since publication?
Are there spelling, grammar or typographical errors?
Purpose: The reason the information exists__/10
What is the purpose of the information? Is it to inform, teach, sell, entertain or persuade?
Do the authors / sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear?
Is the information fact, opinion or propaganda?
Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
What are the political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional or personal biases?
How was/is this author paid for their study? What are their funding $ource$?